How One Equity-Rich Homeowner Turned a Low-Yield Property Into a High-Performing Portfolio
- Davenport Real Estate Group Operations
- Dec 3, 2025
- 2 min read

In a region defined by innovation, the smartest financial move isn’t happening in tech — it’s happening in real estate portfolios. The strategy most Silicon Valley homeowners overlook? Reallocating residential equity into commercial and NNN income-producing assets.
When you compare the numbers, the shift becomes obvious.
Case Study: A Cupertino Home vs. a $4M Industrial Building in San Jose
A long-time Cupertino homeowner wanted “safe” income by renting out a $4M home. Once we evaluated the cashflow, it became clear: the house could not compete with commercial performance.
Scenario 1: Holding the Cupertino Home as a Rental
Market Rent: $7,500–$8,500/month
Annual Gross: $96,000
Typical Annual Expenses:
Property tax: ~$48,000
Maintenance: ~$8,000–$12,000
Insurance: ~$2,800
Vacancy/turnover: ~$4,000–$6,000
Cash Flow:
$28,000–$33,000 net per year
Net Yield: 0.7%–0.8%
Summary: A $4M home generating ~$2,500 a month in net income — with constant involvement and exposure to maintenance, turnover, and regulation.
Scenario 2: Repositioning Into a $4M Industrial Asset (San Jose)
We sourced a stabilized small-bay industrial building occupied by a strong service-based tenant — one of Silicon Valley’s most resilient sectors.
Purchase Price: $4,000,000
Market Cap Rate: 5.25%–6.00%
Structure: NNN (tenant covers taxes, insurance, maintenance)
Cash Flow:
$210,000–$240,000 net per year
Net Yield: 5.25%–6.00%
Summary:6–8× more income than the Cupertino home — with passive management and corporate-backed security.
Cash Flow Side-by-Side
Asset | Value | Annual Net Income | Yield | Hands-On? |
Cupertino Home | $4,000,000 | $28K–$33K | 0.7%–0.8% | Yes |
San Jose Industrial | $4,000,000 | $210K–$240K | 5.25%–6% | No (NNN) |
Outcome: A commercial building produces the income of six residential rentals — without the burden of managing six homes.
The Transformation
Before (Residential):
$30K annual net income
High operating and management load
Limited depreciation benefits
After (Commercial/NNN):
$220K+ annual net income
Zero day-to-day management
Corporate-backed lease stability
Superior tax benefits
This shift wasn’t risky —it was strategic.
Why Most Silicon Valley Owners Miss This Opportunity
Because most owners assume:
“Homes appreciate more.”
“Rentals are safe.”
“Commercial is complicated.”
But today’s data shows:
Residential rent growth is flattening
Operating costs are rising
Appreciation is no longer guaranteed
Commercial & NNN provide income first, appreciation second
Wealth grows faster when income is stable, predictable, and scalable.
Next Week: How This Investor Saved $720,000 in Taxes
In our next case-study spotlight, you’ll see how this same client leveraged:
A 1031 exchange,
Bonus depreciation, and
A cost-segregation accelerated depreciation strategy
…to offset income and save over $720,000 in taxes.
This is where cashflow meets tax efficiency — and where real wealth accelerates.









Comments