top of page

How One Equity-Rich Homeowner Turned a Low-Yield Property Into a High-Performing Portfolio

  • Writer: Davenport Real Estate Group Operations
    Davenport Real Estate Group Operations
  • Dec 3, 2025
  • 2 min read
ree


In a region defined by innovation, the smartest financial move isn’t happening in tech — it’s happening in real estate portfolios. The strategy most Silicon Valley homeowners overlook? Reallocating residential equity into commercial and NNN income-producing assets.


When you compare the numbers, the shift becomes obvious.


Case Study: A Cupertino Home vs. a $4M Industrial Building in San Jose


A long-time Cupertino homeowner wanted “safe” income by renting out a $4M home. Once we evaluated the cashflow, it became clear: the house could not compete with commercial performance.


Scenario 1: Holding the Cupertino Home as a Rental

Market Rent: $7,500–$8,500/month

Annual Gross: $96,000

Typical Annual Expenses:

  • Property tax: ~$48,000

  • Maintenance: ~$8,000–$12,000

  • Insurance: ~$2,800

  • Vacancy/turnover: ~$4,000–$6,000


Cash Flow:

  • $28,000–$33,000 net per year

  • Net Yield: 0.7%–0.8%


Summary: A $4M home generating ~$2,500 a month in net income — with constant involvement and exposure to maintenance, turnover, and regulation.


Scenario 2: Repositioning Into a $4M Industrial Asset (San Jose)

We sourced a stabilized small-bay industrial building occupied by a strong service-based tenant — one of Silicon Valley’s most resilient sectors.


Purchase Price: $4,000,000

Market Cap Rate: 5.25%–6.00%

Structure: NNN (tenant covers taxes, insurance, maintenance)


Cash Flow:

  • $210,000–$240,000 net per year

  • Net Yield: 5.25%–6.00%


Summary:6–8× more income than the Cupertino home — with passive management and corporate-backed security.


Cash Flow Side-by-Side

Asset

Value

Annual Net Income

Yield

Hands-On?

Cupertino Home

$4,000,000

$28K–$33K

0.7%–0.8%

Yes

San Jose Industrial

$4,000,000

$210K–$240K

5.25%–6%

No (NNN)

Outcome: A commercial building produces the income of six residential rentals — without the burden of managing six homes.


The Transformation

Before (Residential):

  • $30K annual net income

  • High operating and management load

  • Limited depreciation benefits


After (Commercial/NNN):

  • $220K+ annual net income

  • Zero day-to-day management

  • Corporate-backed lease stability

  • Superior tax benefits


This shift wasn’t risky —it was strategic.


Why Most Silicon Valley Owners Miss This Opportunity


Because most owners assume:

  • “Homes appreciate more.”

  • “Rentals are safe.”

  • “Commercial is complicated.”


But today’s data shows:

  • Residential rent growth is flattening

  • Operating costs are rising

  • Appreciation is no longer guaranteed

  • Commercial & NNN provide income first, appreciation second

Wealth grows faster when income is stable, predictable, and scalable.


Next Week: How This Investor Saved $720,000 in Taxes


In our next case-study spotlight, you’ll see how this same client leveraged:

  • A 1031 exchange,

  • Bonus depreciation, and

  • A cost-segregation accelerated depreciation strategy

…to offset income and save over $720,000 in taxes.


This is where cashflow meets tax efficiency — and where real wealth accelerates.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page